Oh, But The Home Of The Future Is Sooooo 1939

The future home will probably be equipped with a number of control centers, from any one of which the homemaker can give her commands to appliances at work in the kitchen and laundry. Electric ranges already are equipped with automatic controls for temperature and cooking time, but there is no practical reason why these operations together with the other appliances cannot be controlled remotely from any room the house.”

- Popular Mechanics “The Electrice Home of the Future,” Aug, 1939

The folks at the Industry Standard have offered up a new predictive look at the home of future, this time projecting ahead to 2013. The “Home Of The Future” is a common thought experiment that allows futurists, engineers, artists and business people to trace a path to the present by looking backwards from the future (hey, that sounds familiar), and the Industry Standard offers an interesting guide.

t’s 2013, and you’ve just come home from work. As you pull into the driveway, you reach into your pocket and swipe the screen of your smartphone with your thumb. Your garage door opens and the lights in your house turn on. The TV queues up the shows you missed while you were working late. Your favorite songs are following you from the living room to the kitchen. Then you stop. The phone blinks and warbles at you. The fridge says you forgot the milk.

Welcome home.

In the following pages, you’ll be treated to a glimpse of the toys and technologies that will grace your home in the not-so-distant future. If you are like most people, you probably have already sampled some of them, but others — such as automated home control and personal applications of cloud computing — haven’t made it into people’s homes … yet.

Check out the full article here

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mathew Ingram on The Symbian Unification

Globe & Mail Technology writer Mathew Ingram blogged this morning on Nokia’s announcement yesterday that they intend to acquire the outstanding shares of Symbian that they don’t already own, and together with a whole host of other mobile providers and vendors, will create an open source, unified and standard Mobile OS. From Nokia’s press release:

“Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorola and NTT DOCOMO announced today their intent to unite Symbian OS(TM), S60, UIQ and MOAP(S) to create one open mobile software platform. Together with AT&T;, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments and Vodafone they plan to establish the Symbian Foundation to extend the appeal of this unified software platform.”

Where Mr. Ingram focused on the implications to Google and Apple, I wonder if there isn’t something more at play here.

The big deal here is that with all of the talk of Web 2.0 and SaaS, most in the know tend to think of these as relatively closed systems that are for the most part, Web only, with limited inputs and outputs to other devices and network points. This is certainly for good reason: The examples we’re often given for successful implementations of SaaS, namely Salesforce.com, Google Apps, and even Amazon’s AWS ‘computing cloud’ are all, at their first glance, Web-based.

Nokia, et al, recognize that if any revolutions are going to happen, they’re going to be mobile. And just like the browser wars of the late ’90′s, there is tremendous reason to think that the battleground will be the mobile handset.

Just as Salesforce.com beat entrenched CRM application providers by using the platform to extend the value of their services with third-party apps and widgets, and Facebook surpassed social networking leaders MySpace and Friendster in part by extending the value of the interaction with mini-applications that plug into people’s social networks and enable other forms of non-linear interactions (oh what would the world be without Scrabulous?).

But the iPhone has started to change our concept of Web 2.0 as a web only proposition. This is not because thinking is changing in the technology space, but rather because consumers have awoken to the power of these devices, largely due to the homebrew community that first hacked the iPhone last year. Indeed, once Apple saw the power (and the desire) they needed to open up the platform, and thus the tightly controlling SDK. Now, people realize that mobile phones are powerful input and output devices, and are the Conduit for generating and consuming Content and Commerce anytime, any place. The network provides access to the platform which, in turn provides the appropriate distribution to any device, including IPTV, Web, Digital Signage & Kiosks, and yes, Mobile devices.

Nokia and the rest of the gang are eying the other giants, Apple, Google, RIM, and yes Microsoft with wary eyes, and are firmly aware that the next big thing in mobile won’t be the handset, and it won’t be the content per se… It’s the platform and the network.

Mathew Ingram on the buyout

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

News & Notes on Bill C-61 (AKA Canadian DMCA)

London Ontario’s David Canton has written a column in today’s London Free Press on Bill C-61. As Michael Geist was quick to point out, David minces no words in describing his opinion of the proposed legislation:

“…the bill is flawed and should not be passed in its current state…”

“Canada had an opportunity to set an example for what 21st-century copyright should be but, instead, has subscribed to the traditional views of certain entertainment industry proponents.”

You can read the full column here.

Michael Geist has provided links and analysis to one of the versions of the official Liberal response to constituent concerns, Jame’s Bow’s open letter to Industry Minister Prentice, and a few other notable presentations and opinions on the matter.

It’s interesting to see the big issues coming forward, most eloquently put by Mr. Bow:

“Our justice system demands that we be considered innocent until proven guilty. It is shameful to have companies assume that because we want the ability to format shift or time shift or cut and paste, that we will misuse it.”

While he cites several examples (some of which are actually incorrect) of format shifting that would become illegal under this bill, it’s this statement that rings the most true and is the absolute log-line of the problems with this bill:

“Furthermore, the lack of protections offered by this bill to quote from, parody or criticize copyrighted material disturb me… The new legislation makes it much more difficult to quote supporting material in academic essays… This is a significant imposition on academic freedom in this country, and it could potentially restrict our freedom of speech.

As you run for a party which has argued in favour of personal property rights, I’m surprised that you no longer see fit to protect the right of Canadians to watch what they want, when they want, and how they want after they have legally purchased their song, video or software.”

Again, the full letter can be found here:

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Michael Geist – The Canadian DMCA: A Betrayal

Michael Geist – The Canadian DMCA: A Betrayal

Brlliant

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

ArsTechnica examines "Made-In-Canada DMCA"

Ars Technica reviews the new Canadian Copyright Act (Bill C-61) and comes back with a distressing, albeit not entirely surprising analysis.

The review can be found here

What’s great about the review is that although it most definitely has a point-of-view (e.g. “…those pesky details… make even the “consumer-friendly” parts of the bill a bit less friendly.”), the approach they’ve taken is to be very quiet on the judgement calls. Focusing more on the on-the-ground realities.

The other point that this article brings home is that while this bill is, in part, about curbing intellectual property theft by providing steep provisions for both preventative deterrents and punitive restitution of infringement, the bulk of the creator protections revolves around criminalizing backups of personal DVDs and CDs (movies, software and music) and criminalizing circumvention techniques that include dvd “backup” software, unlocking cellphones, and the like. The article explains that under the new law, it would be:

“…illegal to circumvent DRM [digital rights management] or to provide circumvention services or devices… In addition, rightsholders can go after those who bypass or break DRM schemes, giving them more ability to tie up content and devices simply by adding a bit of encryption.”

What this means is that Sony, for instance, is free to encode their movies so that they’ll only play on their DVD players, and I as a consumer must go and buy a Sony DVD player to make it play, or purchase the movie in another format (at full price) to play on a different device. If you think this won’t happen, it already has. Apple’s fairplay DRM scheme ensures that music purchased through the Apple store will ONLY play back on apple devices at its original quality (you can burn it to a CD and then re-rip it, but it sounds awful).

Anti-circumvention means that I can’t take my DVD collection and rip it to my iPod. It also means I can’t take music CDs with DRM and rip them to my iTunes. Media and content portability is completely criminalized if the creators so wish it.

My other big concern (and it is a big one) is what this will do to the homebrew community in Canada. For an explanation of why this is important, check out my prior blog post on Homebrew.

As to what can be done, I’m not sure. For now, you can look at the Facebook group for Fair Copyright in Canada, or keep checking Michael Geist’s Blog. Of course you can always look at the resources listed on Professor Geist’s “What you can do” posting.

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

David Byrne: Playing the Building – Boing Boing

David Byrne turns the Battery Maritime Building in NYC into a giant musical instrument as part of an art installation called “Playing The Building

My favourite quote from Byrne:

“It’s not like a musician sits down at this and has any more skills playing this than anyone else. It kind of democratizes the whole experience, and I think people know that when they approach it. They realize right away that they’re not any worse and probably not much better than anyone else playing the thing.”

A lot of my own focus is on using WYGIWYS (What You Get Is What You See) tools to democratize content creation services. We’re seeing it extend beyond office tools like powerpoint and into video and audio editing tools (especially mashup tools). It’s classic long tail thinking: When the force of cheap (or free) production tools meets the force of cheap (or free) distribution, democracy is at its best.

Link to BBtv Video on Boing Boing

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Writing Style for Print vs. Web

Link to Jakob Nielsen’s blog at useit.com

Summary:
Linear vs. non-linear. Author-driven vs. reader-driven. Storytelling vs. ruthless pursuit of actionable content. Anecdotal examples vs. comprehensive data. Sentences vs. fragments.

Great explanation of the inherent differences in writing for the Web versus writing for print or TV. He identifies, in part, the way we write for lean-forward experiences (the Web) and lean-back experiences (TV).

Writing Style for Print vs. Web (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox)

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

eCommerce Goes Rube Goldberg

h/t to my friend Kadie for this one…

http://producten.hema.nl/

From her eMail:

HEMA is a Dutch department store. The first store opened on November 4, 1926, in Amsterdam . Now there are 150 stores all over the Netherlands . HEMA also has stores in Belgium, Luxemburg, and Germany. In June of 2007, HEMA was sold to British investment company Lion Capital.

Take a look at HEMA’s product page. You can’t order anything and it’s in Dutch but just wait a couple of seconds and watch what
happens.

This company has a sense of humor and a great computer programmer.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Matthew Ingram on Gmail Labs

Matthew Ingram is weighing in on Google’s new “Google Labs” service on their gMail application:

”Labs” allows users to try out all kinds of new features and then immediately let Gmail developers know what they think.

As a User Experience practitioner myself, one of the biggest misnomers I have to overcome personally and with those I work with is the idea that User Experience Design (UXD) must be approached by asking users what they say they want rather than by what users actually do.

Mr. Ingram disputes this idea, saying:

“Obviously, anyone who uses any Google app or service can send an email to a support address, check an online forum, use something like GetSatisfation, or check support groups or FAQs. But how many users give up before they do all of those things? That’s feedback a designer or developer could use — and eventually, they will probably get it… I don’t think Gmail Labs is that different — it’s just more feedback, faster.”

The above examples focus on what users want, rather than what they actually need. Think about it this way. Let’s say you put together a shopping list based on a dinner you might hypothetically serve. Without looking at a guest list, you might buy either too much or too little, and run the risk of serving things most of your friends wont eat.

If you call each potential guest and ask them what they’d like to eat, you’ll get a myriad of answers, and most will be based on whimsical desire of the moment rather than something that’ll work for everyone. Consensus in this case will only serve to satisfy the few and potentially annoy some guests as well.

But if you look at a guest list, understand what your guests actually eat, and then plan the meal, you’ll be closer to the mark. It’s the same with developing new features. Understanding the experience from the user’s perspective means observing the user and drawing conclusions from those observations.

Ultimately, Mr. Ingram seems to come round, stating:

“The lesson, in other words, is not to try and anticipate all the ways someone might want to use your service — see how they use it, and then focus on that.”

Link

Posted in General | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Chris Anderson Speaks on Free.

Courtesy of the Jason Calcanis and the gang at Mahalo, Wired Editor-In-Chief and Long Tail stopped by to give an hour long talk on his new book: Free. Upon release, he will be giving it away, you guessed it… Free.

Both videos are about 30mins, so it’s a 1 hour viewing time. There are some great tidbits in there, and some powerful, if admittedly unfinished ideas.

Part I

Part II

Link to Mahalo blog post:Mahalo Live Lunch with Chris Anderson

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment